Talk:The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump

27
Don't really see the need for inline sources, but just in case, as per sources (two of them used for this article) Regards, Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 00:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * https://www.salon.com/2017/09/19/the-dangerous-case-of-donald-trump-robert-jay-lifton-and-bill-moyers-on-a-duty-to-warn_partner/
 * https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/09/17/trump_vs_psychiatrists_whos_crazier_135019.html
 * https://www.amazon.com/Dangerous-Case-Donald-Trump-Psychiatrists/dp/1250179459
 * http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-psychiatrists-madness-catching-goldwater-rule-yale-dr-bandy-lee-a7971326.html
 * http://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2017/09/is_donald_trump_actually_crazy.html

Vox article
Vox says that their goal is clear, explanatory journalism, and this article does that very well:

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/1/5/16770060/trump-mental-health-psychiatrist-25th-amendment The psychiatrist who briefed Congress on Trump’s mental state: this is “an emergency” The case for evaluating the president’s mental capacity — by force if necessary. By Eliza Barclay Vox Jan 5, 2018

--Nbauman (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Added to support an existing sentence with a cited quote. Thanks, — Paleo  Neonate  – 19:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Attribution for use of material in Draft:Mental health of Donald Trump
Material from this page has been incorporated into Draft:Mental health of Donald Trump. bd2412 T 01:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Cannon comment
I removed it for a few reasons: it seems to be a random opinion by someone who misunderstood the foreword and who believes that Trump derangement syndrome is an actual thing. The foreword was a survey of important history events where psychologists have participated. Apart from that and calling all those events malignant, there was no claim of equivalency. — Paleo Neonate  – 18:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Advertisement tag
I left it as I think that part of the lead and maybe the beginning of the reception section appear promotional. The lead section part cites a primary source about that it was a best-seller, that a new edition was in demand, etc. — Paleo  Neonate  – 18:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)