Talk:The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception

Just a note: This article is a waste of time and the article on Essenes contain contradictory information. This article claims the Essenes were first century (apparently AD), the article on Essenes claims 2nd Century BC Khoros 18:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

I just deleted the category Pseudohistory from the article. Who is the authority that states that this is so? To me it seems POV pushing, though I disagree with the hypothesis, I am not sure that we can call it categorically false. --Storm Rider (talk) 21:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment
Having come across and read the book - there are a number of blatantly obvious errors (Octavian Augustus as the son rather than the adoptive son of Julius Caesar, someone being connected to the School of Oriental Studies, London, rather than School of Oriental and African Studies etc), and there is an overt anti-Catholic hierarchy/Vatican tone. What are the other, more significant, errors?

To what extent are the deductions 'of their time' (before PCs in the modern sense, in the period between the end of ARPANET and the end of the USSR etc)? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)