Talk:The Dirty Picture/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 14:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll review this article, as I'm happy to see that the links have been fixed.


 * Note: there is one dead link - ref 23. MathewTownsend (talk) 14:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I have removed the dead link. Thanks. :) Smarojit (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

(This article has some very strange wording in it. Is it a translation or something? I have copy edited some of it but I'm unsure if I am interpreting the meaning correctly.)
 * review
 * lede
 * "the hero of the film" - needs citation
 * "The film's music, composed by Vishal Shekhar with lyrics by Rajat Aroraa, was popular." - needs better word than "popular" - popular by what standards?
 * plot
 * "where her mother disconnects with Silk forever" - what does "disconnects" mean? - disowned
 * "degrade" - I don't think this is the word you want - I have changed it in several places
 * " on the same lines" - what lines?
 * Cast
 * "libelous"? - what is meant here?
 * "enjoys the flesh of women" encyclopedic wording?

(I will continue - the article needs a copy edit.)

MathewTownsend (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Changes made
 * lead
 * Provided a citation for "the hero of the film"
 * Removed the use of "popular"
 * plot
 * Copy edited the plot
 * Cast
 * Used scandalous instead of libelous.


 * Smarojit (talk) 04:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * review continued
 * "enjoys the flesh of women" - doesn't seem like encyclopedic wording
 * "Additionally, all actors, including Balan and Shah attended workshops for almost two months before filming could begin." why? what were the workshops about?
 * "met-at-a-party stories, quick tea-break chats," - doesn't seem like encyclopedic language

(will continue) MathewTownsend (talk) 21:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Made the above changes. Smarojit (talk) 04:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the changes. The wording is still a little odd in places but I attribute that to cultural differences. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Reply

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Congratulations! Good job on an interesting film! MathewTownsend (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: