Talk:The Diving Pool/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 10:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC) 

Final

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Presenting a book sans slabs of text and excerpts is challenging. Well done, here. Yes, links, citations to references are accurate and appropriate. Follows MOS; all references are reliable sources; (for a Japanese novella, well done) Yes, suitably broad in coverage. NPOV is presented. 7 editors for 43 edits, 7278 page views for 60 days. A stable article is encountered. Image is a book cover; qualifies as fair use for non-free images. Accepted.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):


 * 1) Overall:

A neat, informative presentation of Japanese novella, topic of 	Psychological horror, magical realism, surrealism. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)