Talk:The Division Bell/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:

I will be reviewing this article. At first glance, you need to correct the infobox as per infobox album by moving the critical reviews to the #Reception section. Also, you need to wikilink your sources and not just list them as "allmusic.com" or "billboard.com". --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 07:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I just want to really quickly note that Ref #49 (http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/retrieve_chart_history.do?model.chartFormatGroupName=Albums&model.vnuArtistId=61137&model.vnuAlbumId=768708) is a deadlink that needs to be fixed. –MuZemike 22:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Noting that reviewer hasn't edited in a while, and since there isn't much of a start a new reviewer needs to take over and do a review. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 04:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review
This was not marked as "under review" at WP:GAN, so I'll take over. Pyrotec (talk) 11:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Pyrotec - I had wondered what was happening here... Parrot of Doom 13:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Not a lot it seems. But should be finished today - depends if I find "errors" that I need fixing. Pyrotec (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I now know what Andy Mabbett does in the real world. Pyrotec (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ta very muchly :) Parrot of Doom 15:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)