Talk:The Dragon and the Doctor/GA1

GA review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

 * Improve the non-free use rationale for the image with this template.
 * That being said, the infobox looks good.
 * Lead summarizes the entire article so no problems there.
 * Plot section looks good as well.
 * Couldn't find any issues in #Writing or #Reception.
 * However, I would add another subsection/header to #References. You can decide which one (see example 1 and example 2).
 * With that in mind, references themselves are in great shape.

Progress

 * Thanks ! I've addressed both points; let me know if there's any other work you think this article would benefit from. Kindly —Collint c 17:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The non-free use rationale was not improved. You can simply do this by copy-and-pasting the template and filling in several key parameters including the article, use, author, and source.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Aha, I understand now. Added! —Collint c 17:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)