Talk:The Economist (Lost)

Clean-up
The information provided in this article is excellent, especially the litteral analysis. But the article really needs a template clean-up. 77.241.139.217 (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * All of that has been removed because it was copied from Lostpedia and violated a few policies and guidelines. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  22:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Zoe Bell?
It says she was a guest star in this episode. Did I miss that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.188.69.161 (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * She did voice acting as Regina. She will physically appear in "Ji Yeon".  – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  22:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

GA Review
Hello. Here are a few things that I felt could be done to help the article.

Lead-
 * The first sentence seems a bit lengthy. Nothing really wrong with it as is, but it might help to separate the sentence at "....episode overall" and "that was aired...." and revise it a bit.
 * Sayid, Charlotte, and Faraday are all linked twice. It's usually common to not link in the lead, and to leave the link in the plot.

Plot-
 * Is there a link for Jacob?

Production-
 * Cuse and Lindelof need to be both introduced and linked.
 * It's already stated that Andrews portrays Sayid, and he's already been introduced, so only his last name is needed in the first sentence of the last paragraph.

Reception-
 * Can we get a number on the amount of British viewers?
 * I'm guessing that 5.8/15 is in Nielsen Ratings, so a link to Nielsen, as well as a short explanation of what they mean should be added.

Per GAN rules, one week (seven days) is an appropriate amount of time for the completion of these requests. Please place a message on my talk page once you have completed these requests or have placed a reason as to why a request cannot or should not be completed. Once you're done, I'll review it again, and if it looks good, I'll pass it. Have a good day! Mastrchf91 (t/c) 13:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Normally Will (the writer/nominator) would be doing this, but he is on vacation. Concerns have been addressed, with the exception of adding a Nielsen explanantion.  – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  20:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Mastrchf91 (t/c) 23:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on The Economist (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080219072733/http://www.film.com:80/tv/story/lostistryingtomakeushatesayidbutitwontwork/13982602/18458420 to http://www.film.com/tv/story/lostistryingtomakeushatesayidbutitwontwork/13982602/18458420

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Economist (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090219074200/http://www.abcmedianet.com/primeschedule/ABCGRIDSJAN28FEB24.xls to http://www.abcmedianet.com/primeschedule/ABCGRIDSJAN28FEB24.xls
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080229094412/http://www.tvguide.com/news/lost-naveen-andrews/080131-01 to http://www.tvguide.com/news/lost-naveen-andrews/080131-01

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)