Talk:The Edge of Destruction/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Auldhouse (talk · contribs) 23:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Pass! Great article and a job well-done.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written. Pass. I did a little copy edit pass and fixed a few quotations and other things.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable. Pass.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage. Pass.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * a (major aspects):  b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy. Pass.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable. Pass.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. Pass. Good explanation of use for image.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. Pass. Good explanation of use for image.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass: