Talk:The English Roses/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Auldhouse (talk · contribs) 02:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

I'd be glad to review the English Roses article. --Auldhouse (talk) 02:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you Auldhouse :) — IB [ Poke ] 04:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * This is a well-written article. I ran it through Grammarly and fixed a few minor copyediting issues. You might want to add a list to the Aftermath and sequels section with a list of the titles of the sequels. --Auldhouse (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Pass. Sources are verifiable and no plagarism issues. --Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article adheres to the template for NovelsWikiProject and provides not only a synopsis but information about the publication, literary significance, and reception.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article is fair and without bias.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * It would be great to add a photo of Madonna at an event for this book but may be hard to find.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations! This is a well-written, entertaining, and informative article. I remember all the hoopla when this book was first published. I was very pleased to read all of the behind-the-scenes information about the origins of the book. Keep writing!--Auldhouse (talk) 16:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot Auldhouse :) — IB [ Poke ] 16:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot Auldhouse :) — IB [ Poke ] 16:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)