Talk:The Exposé

Is the source used reliable?
This page relies heavily on one source, Logically, which seems to be a blog. Cdefm (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Other sources for this page, in the main, are "fact check" articles. "Fact check" articles are opinion articles and not necessarily facts as admitted by Facebook in a court case. Most "fact check" articles are written by writers or bloggers and not experts. "Fact check" articles cannot be considered as credible sources for Wikipedia pages any more than blogs can be.

The more truth pushes through "the more fakeism is promoted" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:2D0B:5200:325:6AD3:FCD2:FF32 (talk) 19:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The exposé is similar to a blog too, it cannot be considered a reliable source either. 83.37.36.63 (talk) 10:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Conspiracy
I believe using the word conspiracy is inadquate as several cases have shown truth in much of the argumentaiton against the "public" narrative. Oxycotin is an example of people being labled "conspiracy" where it indeed deemed to be true what they said. Conspiracy is based on non-fact (according to Wiki), but several courtcases have proven that many of the things deemed as misleading Covid information, is indeed true. Also, who are deeming them false? The same media/organisations that deem the information misleading - which by itself consitute a problem. 93.161.218.211 (talk) 15:20, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * who are deeming them false? That is not the cuestion. The cuestion is, Do you have any proof of what you are publishing?
 * the burden of proof falls on the accuser, In The Expose many claims are made without evidence, that is the problem 83.37.36.63 (talk) 10:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)