Talk:The Eye (2008 film)

Untitled
Why does the plot summary say Jessica Alba's character's name is Sydney while in the cast section it says Allison? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.95.155.219 (talk) 03:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Marco Beltrami is now the composer, not Badalementi. Can someone change that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.108.83.12 (talk) 06:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Tom Cruise a producer??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.245.122.97 (talk) 18:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, actually, Tom Cruise is a producer...if you dont belive me, look it up in wikipedia, im sure u will change ur mind. (Arsenalboi17 (talk) 07:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC))

The Extended 3 minute Trailer
 For those who haven't seen it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Can Not (talk • contribs) 14:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

......... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.245.122.97 (talk) 18:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Visual effects

 * The Eye: A Fresh VFX Transplant — Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Trim down?
This plot is really, really long. We don't need a whole re-telling of the movie, just a synopsis. Agreed? Elisa EX PL OS i ON talk.  15:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * agreed. way too long.  when the plot is 95% of the wiki-page, something is wrong. -- Jophus00 (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It certainly needs pointless details removing. "The credits roll" is not plot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.82.105 (talk) 01:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Promotional Poster
A picture of Jessica Alba (as beautiful as she may be), is not a "promotional poster." does someone have a copy of the poster to replace it? -- Jophus00 (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Wrong, the only picture displayed is the Eye DVD front cover, not a picture of Jessica Alba, notice the hand coming out of the eye itself. Very eerie. (Arsenalboi17 (talk) 07:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC))

Meaning of Digital
"The two-disc DVD and Blu-ray versions include a digital copy of the film for use on Windows and Mac computers."

Seriously, please stop using the word out of place! Why make 'digital' synonymous with crap, low bitrate good-for-nothing material? The whole disk is digital for gods sake. I have not seen this release and don't know the used video format, so I can't edit that sentence myself. But it should say: ..a low-bitrate copy of the whole film in MPEG-4 AVC format for use in a computer. (Obviously the bitrate must be low, either way it wouldn't fit on the disc together with all the extras.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by J7n (talk • contribs) 07:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Are you not following the current trend in home video format? A growing percentage of Blu-ray and DVD releases are including this "digital copy" along with the standard material. They are calling it "digital copy", so why would we call it anything else? Surely we won't be calling it "turd lollipops". If you have a problem with the term "digital copy", tell the studios, not Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.206.146.85 (talk) 05:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Odd Thomas
Hey, this movie reminded me of the bodachs in Dean Koontz's Odd Thomas. Is there any connection? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcchat66 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Asia's most successful horror film
I removed the line "This film is also Asia's most successful horror film," since it has no citation and seems a little dubious. Asia's a big continent... I've got no problem with adding it back in if we can show that it's true. Meliadoul (talk) 03:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)