Talk:The Fifth Discipline

remove broken link
who is interested could still see it here. Erkan Yilmaz 23:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Restored. There were questions about notability so I restored this and a previously-removed "global" reference as well.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  20:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Notability is not an issue
An editor recently asked why this page doesn't violate WP:CSD, which states that unambiguous advertising or promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia. The implication was that this article does not belong in the project.

I checked Google Scholar and this book has over 3700 citations. Even if those numbers are inflated by 100%, it's still over 1800 citations in Google Scholar, more than enough to put a heavy WP:BURDEN on anyone who claims the book does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BOOK. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Comment should be move to talk page?
The comment at Talk:The_Fifth_Discipline/Comments would be more appropriate here on the talk page, rather than on the banner comments. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 08:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)