Talk:The Filthy Critic

Untitled
Is there someone who could clean up this page? I am not a very good writer and I would really like to see someone do The Filthy Critic some justice.

---

ok, someone keeps upping the ante for statistical data. the challenge is on! ;-)

---

Also, we could use some more quotes from his reviews to help emphasize the synopsis and make it more NPOV. I'm new to the 'pedia, but I recall reading that simply describing someone w/o quotes or statements is discouraged.

Added a couple of quotes. I'm also pretty new and uneducated at this editing thing, so please chime in if you disagree with the presentation. I'd also like to see a good page for Filthy. I love his reviews. Rufus Sarsaparilla 19:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents of this page
Mark Sweep: The last post to this page was from May 2006. Gershwinrb's concerns seem to have been addressed. The other comments have been lingering for some time. Do you really think we need to keep these old bits around? Would you have preferred an archived page, for just these few random comments? Scott Carpenter 02:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

NPOV
Should there really be lines that read "very often astutely points out", "He is very succinct with his criticism", et al... This article does not seem very objective because of commentary like that. Gershwinrb 05:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Filthy is back with a new blog, and a new persona
That was it. I came here looking for answers but found nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.237.54 (talk) 06:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)