Talk:The Financial Express (India)

Addressing issues with article
3 issues are mentioned in a Mar'15 review, but the discussion seems unavailable on the talk page.

- This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (March 2015)

- This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (March 2015)

- This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2015)

All 3 issues still seem to exist in the article, which needs a comprehensive rewrite to comply with AD and CS. Does anyone have relevant background for the same? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.1.208.98 (talk) 11:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello sir i have important talk with you Tenzing karma Tamang (talk) 15:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 6 September 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved (page mover nac) Flooded  with them hundreds  10:41, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

The Financial Express (India) → The Financial Express – This clearly fits the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC criteria for the title. The other newspaper, The Financial Express (Bangladesh), is simply not as popular or commonly known. When people search for The Financial Express they are looking for the Indian newspaper not the Bangladesh one as can be clearly seen by the page views: FE India; FE Bangladesh. The Bangladesh newspaper is nowhere to be found in the search results which only list the Indian newspaper. I propose the current page be moved as above with a hat-note pointing to the Bangladesh newspaper. Gotitbro (talk) 15:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. &#x222F; WBG converse 04:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)  --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 20:53, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: It should be noted that the page The Financial Express previously listed the Indian newspaper before it was disambiguated by User:Kmzayeem without discussion. Gotitbro (talk) 15:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment isn't improving the article more of a priority? In ictu oculi (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose – The disambiguation page has been stable for 5 years, so we are not talking about reverting a recent undiscussed move. Both newspapers are notable enough, and both articles should be expanded anyway. Status quo looks fine. — JFG talk 10:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I have added Distinguish hatnotes on both articles, to help readers. — JFG talk 10:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose - I agree with above users that primary concerns should be disambiguation and expansion of both the articles.--Politicoindian (talk) 00:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.