Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miyagawa   (talk)  00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. Miyagawa  (talk)  00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better.

And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! Miyagawa  (talk)  00:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed!. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! Ruby2010   talk  00:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

All good, happy to grade this one as a GA! Miyagawa   (talk)  09:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)