Talk:The Fitzhugh

Delete Again?
This is only marginally better than the first Fitzhugh article. It still lacks notability and has a COI problem. Can it be fixed? I doubt it, but I am open to any argument. Dethlock99 (talk) 17:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

How would someone go about fixing the page? There are sources, and sure, there's a conflict of interest, so what does that mean? Should someone without a conflict of interest go in and edit it? Please explain. 207.167.19.157 (talk) 21:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, I live in Jasper and aws just browsing and took a look at the Fitz page. Cleaned it up a little. I don't have a conflict of inteerst with the subejct, if that helps. Zigfarria (talk) 22:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)