Talk:The Five Love Languages

Citation
I attempted to track down the citation needed for the following line:

Research does, however, support the portion of Chapman's work on self-regulating behavior to match a partner's wants and needs.[citation needed]

I am not sure if what I have found is 'good enough' ('primary'?) or if it needs a subsection different than critisms since its technically a support?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314026543_Walking_the_walk_talking_the_talk_Love_languages_self-regulation_and_relationship_satisfaction_Love_languages_self-regulation_and_satisfaction

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pere.12182

2603:6010:C100:827B:E171:38A1:4D1E:777C (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Single studies are not usually very reliable. It's usually best to use review articles, which involve academics reading a bunch of studies and then interpreting the results for us. However if you were to add that Wiley link as a citation that's probably better than nothing. Should probably avoid ResearchGate links since ResearchGate is often a red flag for preprints. Not in this case, but still, I think using the Wiley link is better. Hope this helps. – Novem Linguae (talk) 22:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

When someone love u
when someone loves u;you must show she or he that love and they become lovers 41.116.125.233 (talk) 18:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)