Talk:The Flesh Eaters (film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flesheatersposter.jpg
Image:Flesheatersposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on The Flesh Eaters (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071016101809/http://horror-wood.com:80/flesh.htm to http://www.horror-wood.com/flesh.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Citation and Expansion
This article is poorly written, developed, and sourced. It is in dire need of attention, much of the information in the article is unsourced and missing proper citations for its information, these unsourced pieces of information need to be given proper citations or deleted. Also some of the sections in the article are underdeveloped and need to be expanded, the reception section is way too short and needs more reviews from notable critics added to it. There are so many things that need to be done top this article because of its extremely poor development, all of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet WIkipiedia's standards of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)