Talk:The Forgotten Refugees

Include balance in the article
Per the recent deletion discussion, mentions in WP:RS are sparse, but were enough to attain consensus. It seems the JWeekly article was the most (only?) detailed WP:RS on the topic, so we should use that to source unsourced statements.

We also need to reach agreement as to whether it is appropriate to allude to the David Project's nature as an advocacy / propaganda organization. Any views?

Oncenawhile (talk) 10:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)