Talk:The Fox, the Wolf and the Husbandman/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 02:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Look forward to your comments. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 10:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, it's 2nd on my list of pending reviews at the moment. :) Should get to it soon. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 12:41, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Good article nomination on hold
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of June 24, 2013, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?:


 * 1) NOTE: Please respond below entire GA Review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
 * 2) Writing quality is good.
 * 3) Disciplina clericalis - redlink, not necessary, but would be nice if it were created, at least as a sourced stub.
 * 4) Template:Henryson - lots of redlinks here, not required, but would be good if they were created, at least as referenced small articles.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Cite missing at end of sentence at end of Analysis sect.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Analysis sect - can this be expanded upon in size and scope a bit?
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Neutral tone throughout.
 * 5. Article stability? Upon inspection of article edit history and article talk page history going back over one month, no issues with stability.
 * 6. Images?:


 * File:Dunfermline Abbey by John Slezer.jpg - image hosted on Wikimedia Commons, image page checks out okay.
 * File:William caxton.jpg - image hosted on Wikimedia Commons, missing author field. Also, appear to be problems with licensing tag section.

NOTE: Please respond below entire GA Review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Replaced second image, at fault, with another image.
 * Expanded on the Analysis section with an elaboration of a point and an example of Yamamoto's; also re-worded. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 15:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Stumbled on this and completed point #3 Eatmark (talk) 04:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Eatmark
 * Appreciate the work Eatmark. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 19:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Passed as GA
Passed as GA. Thanks for responsiveness to comments, above. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)