Talk:The French Democracy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Starting review, checking quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC) {{pass} No problems with quick fail. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * Lead: ✅
 * Synopsis: ✅ I replaced with with using, better grammar.
 * Background and production: ✅, I made some minor grammatical corrections.
 * Reception and impact: ✅ Jezhotwells (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * b (MoS):
 * The article conforms to WP:MOS Jezhotwells (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * All references check out
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * All appear to be to WP:RS
 * c (OR):
 * I find no evidence of WP:OR Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * The article is broad in its scope
 * b (focused):
 * This article is focussed on its subject. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * This ia fair representation without bias. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * I find no evidence of edit warring, the article when in stub form survived an AfD, but is now well developed. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Images are tagged and licensed or when non-free use, correctly argued fair use rationale.
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Correctly captioned. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have no hesitation in passing this article for GA status. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have no hesitation in passing this article for GA status. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)