Talk:The Frying Game/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 10:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Review will be coming very shortly. Thanks  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 10:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * In Production, the whole start to the second paragraph is unreferenced, please ref it up.
 * Not at all! It's just that all that text uses the same ref, (ref 1) so reffing each sentence or whatever would be rather redundant.


 * That's the only thing I could find in the entire article that could be faulted, this is fantastic work.
 * Thanks! :D


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * As I've said, I couldn't find one single spelling error or poorly structured sentence... and that's my specialty.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): (citations to reliable sources):  (OR):
 * Perfic'.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): (focused):
 * Perfic'
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Perfic'.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Perfic'.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

That was the best Good Article Nom I've ever reviewed. Good job to the nominator!! Just one tiny thing to do and it's through.

 That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 10:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Wow, thanks! And thanks for the review! I think it's pretty much good to go, unless you have found some other concern? :) Queenieacoustic (talk)
 * Wonderful stuff!  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 20:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)