Talk:The GIST

Article accepted, suggestions for improvement
I don't see a problem with notability or sourcing; since the last time the article was submitted, you've added three reliable, secondary sources. I recommend editing the article to remove some of the minor non-encyclopedic tone issues, where the article occasionally reads like an ad. Other than that, I suggest adding back the sources that you previously removed (the primary ones) to use as additional sources, as they'll still help with citing new information. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! Clear friend  a  💬  03:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)