Talk:The Ghost Network/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miyagawa   (talk)  12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I will review this article later today. Miyagawa  (talk)  12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Review:


 * Writing: Can you insert a reference directly after the sentence containing "urban myths or legends of strange events" - I presume its the audio commentary; it'll cover "no man could possibly have known about" too.

Other than that, I can't find any problems. I've made a couple of copyedits. Images all check out, although there is a typo in the free use rationale for the image in the infobox. Good job! Miyagawa  (talk)  21:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I made the ref fix per your suggestion. Let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks for the review!  R uby2010   comment!  16:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Article all checks out against the GA criteria, happy to promote! Miyagawa  (talk)  23:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You have my thanks, as always :)  R uby2010   comment!  23:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)