Talk:The Gift (2000 film)

Removal of selected Triva
i removed 2 trivia items which were stupid to have there in the first place; 5 actors from this movie went on to star in comic book movies and; there is a town in the state that this movie is set in that sound similar to this setting but none of it was filmed there. really, come on people! Purns210.23.130.14 (talk)

Katie Holmes
I've completely reworked the article on Katie Holmes and have posted it on WP:PR in the hopes of advancing it to WP:FAC. I would be grateful for your comments at Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 19:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The Gift (film).jpg
Image:The Gift (film).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The Gift (2000 film).jpg
Image:The Gift (2000 film).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

There are two main plot lines as told on the page. Three instances: house[ mother and neighbour ones], scool and police. The doctors is the missing point. -and threfore the fabulating interpretator tells something about sexual abuse, which is not visible in that fiction. A boy who has been tortured by his father, as a little one, his sight reaches to the second chacra and father dick, at that reminding point. A trauma of the past acted on in that film. Repairing cars is the figure#s job profile, destroying cars either, relates to  the inner conflict the son is able to do. Paradoxal and right!
 * The doctors is out and in!

If a scool directors might be anybodys financees, appeals to me as a cynic joke for those who act on borders seriously, like the actors do. Imaginative and real action is created very tensefull. Best greetings from f.perls. Whose vadalism tells stories about abuse and financees!

Not true?
"Donnie, having enough problems with the local police over his repeated abuse of his wife and threats against Annie, pulls the gun away and drives off."

There was actually another person in the car. It was not Donnie's decision to drive off, it was whoever was in the car with him. While they drove off, Donnie still attempted to hold the gun to his head. He didn't pull away until he was a fair way away. Make sense? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.145.148.89 (talk) 01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Another One
"When Annie explains to Johnson what happened at the pond, he informs her that Buddy Cole hanged himself at the mental hospital earlier that day. She returns to her car to find Buddy gone."

Johnson informed Annie that he died AFTER she returned to the car to find Buddy gone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.145.148.89 (talk) 01:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Corrected this. Vanwaffle (talk) 03:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)