Talk:The Girl Strike Leader/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll finish this soon JAG  UAR   19:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm trying out a new form of review in order to get through these faster (without sacrificing quality of course) JAG  UAR   19:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I would strongly recommend cutting the lead into two paragraphs, but it was minor so I did it myself
 * "Release on July 8th, 1910" - released
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

I'll promote this, it's in as good shape as the others. Well done JAG  UAR   19:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)