Talk:The Glen Shopping Centre

Redundant copied content needed twice?
Erm, this article is almost quite literally word for word identical to the paragraph about The Glen found on the Glen Waverley, Victoria article. Seems a little redundant to me. Should not one or the other be removed, possibly based on whether or not The Glen is noteworthy enough for its own article (if so, chop the repetition out of Glen Waverley, and if not, delete this independant article)...? Thoughts anybody? - Vaelor 08:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Centro Properties Group Logo.PNG
The image File:Centro Properties Group Logo.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --12:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)