Talk:The God Is Not Willing

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for the creation of this article! IMO, it's borderline notable. We're looking at the general notability guideline (WP:GNG) or the book guideline (WP:NBOOK). With only 2 reviews that IMHO are reliable (see WP:RS), which are Publishers Weekly and Tor.com, IMO this meets WP:GNG narrowly or criteria 1 of WP:NBOOK. It's possible that Grimdark Magazine is RS, but IMHO Fantasy Book Review is not one. It's claimed on Amazon that there are more reviews, including one on Salon, though my WP:BEFORE search didn't find too many. Still, given the borderline notability and maybe non-RS (ref 7) and a lot of non-independent refs (that's okay, as long as the article doesn't exclusively depend on it, but here 3 of the 9 refs are non-independent), IMHO a tagging of notability and non-RS are needed. Thanks and I hope this helps!.

VickKiang (talk) 03:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)