Talk:The Golden Compass (film)/to do

Improvements needed before GA renomination
A list of issues brought up during the Good Article and Peer reviews:
 * Production section needs a great deal more coverage, especially given the prior stature of the source material, the large budget and wide PR campaign.
 * This film went $70 million over budget- $180 million is not accurate
 * Expand video game section.
 * Add detail to lead to properly summarise article, specifically including information on the struggle to find a director.
 * Add missing citations.
 * Rework cast section with more information for most of the names, both describing the character and the casting. Add boldface for clarity where necessary.
 * Plot section needs a good copy edit to remove run-ons, dangling phrases, and other sentences which appear muddled, awkward, or grammatically incorrect. ✅ 12:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Consider moving description of the abrupt ending from the development section to either its own section or a more appropriate existing section. ✅ 13:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Trim mention of title misunderstanding to information relevant to the film. All that needs be mentioned in the article is that the title was taken from the American book release, with a passing mention to the UK title. ✅ 12:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)