Talk:The Gospel According to the Meninblack

Fair use rationale for Image:Stranglers - Waltzinblack excerpt.ogg
Image:Stranglers - Waltzinblack excerpt.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Last Supper scene
its inside artwork a reproduction of The Last Supper, altered to depict a solemn Maninblack standing watchfully behind Jesus. Actually, IIRC, the Maninblack is actually leaning over while reaching inside his jacket to what is presumably a shoulder holster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.251.60 (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The Maninblack in question is three to the right of Jesus - replacing Philip - and behind Matthew's right arm. If you check out the original painting File:Última Cena - Da Vinci 5.jpg or File:Leonardo da Vinci - Ultima cena - ca 1975.jpg you'll see that whilst Philip's face, hair and clothing are all changed to become the Maninblack, his hands are the same. I don't think Philip would have reached for a weapon of any type. Since the original statement is unrefd, I've amended it. -- Red rose64 (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)