Talk:The Great Milenko/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 21:19, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Lead

 * The alternative cover grossly fails WP:NFCC #3.a and #8. If you feel that the cover is important you can discuss it in the article, but it is simply a different colour, and is not needed.
 * There is no section on singles, which there clearly should be, and it should be covered in the lead

Background and development

 * Could you rename it 'Background', and the following section 'Recording', as they seem to be similar topics?
 * This section doesn't lead anywhere, and doesn't even mention The Great Milenko in it

Recording process

 * Change 'A&R' to artists and repertoire
 * Hollywood Records can be linked earlier than it is
 * "Bruce who knew very little about the Sex Pistols..." - comma after Bruce

Musical style

 * Please trim File:Boogie Woogie Wu ICP.ogg to 26 seconds and lower the quality per WP:SAMPLE
 * "Southwest Voodoo samples the track Voodoo by X-Clan." This sentence is unreferenced and given completely without context.

Promotion and release

 * Mention the release dates here
 * 63 → number sixty-three (or number 63)
 * Likewise #1 → number one (not number 1)
 * "Despite the rough start, The Great Milenko has old well over the years" - typo here?
 * RIAA needs to be spelt out first (disregarding the lead), and a link
 * You can link 'certified gold' to RIAA certification
 * Ref 23 should go at end of sentence

Critical reception

 * "critics complimented the albums improved sound" - apostrophe missing in "album's"

Track listing

 * You don't need to cite each reference twice
 * What is the second release?

Charts and certification
The 'Singles' table should be converted into prose earlier in the article