Talk:The Great Patty Caper/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 22:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Having a look.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 22:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking time to review this one! :) Mediran ( t  •  c ) 07:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

OK, here are some issues with the article.
 * 1) In the episode, the key to the vault holding the Krabby Patty recipe got lost got -> gets per WP:TENSE
 * Done. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) The plot should be re-written to be 100% in the present tense.
 * Done. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Patrick stupidly breaks Stupidly is a bit too colloquial. Mind re-wording?
 * Done. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Mr. Krabs sends the Krabby Patty recipe to a far away vault for safe keeping so that Plankton can’t get to it. But when Mr. Krabs forgets the recipe himself he gives SpongeBob the key to the vault and sends him on a journey across the ocean to retrieve it. Things go bad when the key goes missing aboard the Oceanic Express train and SpongeBob must identify the culprit and get the key back before the Krabby Patty recipe is missing forever! This is a very long quote. Perhaps you should blockquote it.
 * Done. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Nancy Basile of the About.com, Paul Mavis of the DVD Talk, Billy Gil of the Home Media Magazine, and Roy Hrab of the DVD Verdict, you can remove the "the" from before the media. It's not needed.
 * Done. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) was not positive on the DVD I feel "not positive towards the DVD" would be better.
 * Done. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

On hold.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 19:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Taylor Trescott! First of all, thank you for reviewing this article. It's really appreciated. Anyway, I would like to suggest to "fail" this GAN as I feel it doesn't meet the criteria and it actually lacks on production info. I have thought of that before. BTW, this GA review already serves as a reference on how this article be better. It depends if you will "pass" or "fail" this and it's your choice. Thanks! :) Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)