Talk:The Great Ziegfeld/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 15:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Will review it in the next couple of days. -- smaro jit  HD 15:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

In my opinion, this is one of the best film-related articles on Wikipedia and meets each one of the GA criteria. Happy to pass this with no comments, not even minor ones. Excellent job!:) -- smaro jit  HD 09:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)