Talk:The Great and Secret Show

Edits
I vastly shortened the first thirty, forty percent. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lots42 (talk • contribs).

Fair use rationale for Image:Show1-250.jpg
Image:Show1-250.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Plot summary
Some time in mid-2006 this article was visited upon by a huge, bloated, blow-by-blow account of the plot, which had grown to nearly 2500 words. There doesn't seem to have been any significant plot summary before then beyond the precis in the lead section.

It would be nice to have a brief summary, perhaps a fifth or a quarter of the size of that monster, but since it seems unlikely that any such slim creature could emerge by chipping away at the larger edifice, I have decided simply to remove the thing in the hope that some talented reader will be inspired by a clean sheet to produce something wonderful. --TS 03:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll take a stab at it. It's been a while since I've read the book, but I should be able to adjust it into a more concise, better written version. I never had a problem with the length but did feel it was rather amateurishly written and formatted. Quiddity99 (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Quiddity99
 * Thanks. The quality of the writing is really what matters.  The length is negotiable. --TS 22:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm done with an initial draft, which was able to compress the summary to approximately 1/3 its former size without losing a great deal of depth. A lot of the stuff in the former summary had little relevance to the overall plot and was able to be removed without ruining things. Quiddity99 (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Quiddity99
 * Thanks. That's a remarkable job of compression. --TS 22:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)