Talk:The Guardian/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 18:51, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:51, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Failed GA status
Failed GA status due to numerous sourcing problems, poor referencing standards, lack of citations in many places all over entire article:

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Bare links and unformatted cites, please format all cites using 'WP:CIT cite templates.
 * 2) C. P. Scott subsection = last paragraph is uncited.
 * 3) Spanish Civil War subsection = entire section is uncited.
 * 4) Post-war subsection = 2nd sentence has a clarification needed tag.
 * 5) Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq subsection = there's a citation needed tag.
 * 6) Ownership subsection = 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th paragraphs have several uncited sentences.
 * 7) Political stance and editorial opinion subsection = 1st and 2nd paragraph have uncited sentences.
 * 8) Publication history subsection = All paragraphs in this subsection have uncited sentences.
 * 9) Moving to the Berliner paper format subsection = All paragraphs in this subsection have uncited sentences.
 * 10) Reception subsection = 1st paragraph in this section has uncited sentence.
 * 11) Regular content and features = Most of this section is largely uncited.
 * 12) Online media subsection = End of 2nd paragraph is uncited.
 * 13) GuardianFilms subsection = 2nd and 3rd paragraphs have uncited quotes, a big no-no.
 * 14) References in popular culture subsection = End of 1st paragraph is uncited.
 * 15) Awards subsection = Both sub-sects in this sect have lots of uncited material.
 * 16) Editors sect = Totally uncited.
 * 17) Notable regular contributors (past and present) sect = Uncited and tagged as problem sect.
 * 18) The Guardian News & Media Archive sect = largely uncited.