Talk:The Guggenheim Grotto

Notability? Spam?
Can someone clarify why this article has been flagged for lack of notability? A previous, more brief version was deleted for the same reason, so I re-wrote (I might mention several months ago) to add additional info, including information that seems to meet the notability guidelines (specifically, the winning of the Independent Music Award, not to mention airplay on several major radio stations). I'm also somewhat confused about the "spam" marking on the external links section. These are legitimate links for more information about the band and performances, none of which are primarily promotional any more than would be listed for another musician. If there is a quibble over specific links, it seems like the talk page is the place to discuss rather than listing them all as spam. Let's talk instead of just flagging what I see as the good start of an article. - Ctb 21:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to have to agree that this is flagged weird. It now has a press release flag. It is a small band that has some critical wins but not much outside of that. How would this be worded to _not_ sound promotional? That is, how can anything other than their small successes be mentioned in a succinct manner? Nickjost (talk) 20:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

userbox
'''


 * • Ling.Nut (talk) 03:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)