Talk:The Habit of Fire

GA fail
Okay, here is list of what the GA review found:

1. It is reasonably well written. a (prose): Neutral b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): Neutral Prose could use some tweaking. Also, quoted information should be inside quotes. No external links on the lead. -[Will do] 2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): Fail b (citations to reliable sources): Don't Know c (OR): Pass I'm unsure about forum usage. Maybe some other source? -[Which ref? If UltimateMetal interview, the band has officially approved it. on Facebook] Also, Band line-up needs verification. -[Done] 3. It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): Fail b (focused): Neutral Nothing mentioned about critical reception, charts etc. -[No chart info, I will expand critical reception and the like]

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: Pass I don't see any biased stuff. -[Yay!] 5. It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: Pass No edit-wars or stuffs. -[Yay!]

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Neutral b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Neutral The album art could use a better rationale. -[Done]

7. Overall: Pass/Fail: Fail Sorry. You have to work more. See Breakout (album) or Ray of Light or Reign in Blood for an example. --3family6 (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)