Talk:The Habit of Fire/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Novice7  |  Talk  09:36, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay, this article is not close to GA criteria.
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose could use some tweaking. Also, quoted information should be inside quotes. No external links on the lead.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I'm unsure about forum usage. Maybe some other source? Also, Band line-up needs verification.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Nothing mentioned about critical reception, charts etc.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * I don't see any biased stuff.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit-wars or stuffs.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The album art could use a better rationale.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Sorry. You have to work more. See Breakout (album) or Ray of Light or Reign in Blood for an example.