Talk:The Harrowing (Inside No. 9)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I'll take this one within the week. 23W 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks- it's appreciated! J Milburn (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

What a terrifying-sounding episode. Great article! Couldn't find much of anything wrong, which is no surprise, considering you've probably perfected the format with the other GANs for the series. Pass! 23W 20:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Duplication Detector spotchecks turned up nothin'.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for the review, thoroughly appreciated. Any comments, no matter how taxing, picky or small, are welcome. J Milburn (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)