Talk:The Heart of tha Streetz, Vol. 2 (I Am What I Am)

Fair use rationale for Image:Heart of tha streetz 2.jpg
Image:Heart of tha streetz 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bgheartvol2.jpg
The image Image:Bgheartvol2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --11:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

NPOV and Original Research
The best example of an NPOV violation is

"While Vol. 2 isn't necessarily a leap forward for B.G., it holds his established name in good standing.", I am no expert on this at all, but I can tell that is a problem. In addition there are very little if no reference at all for anything in this article. This all feels like a person just wrote it like a blog article (hence the original research claim) example

"Vol. 1, in typical B.G. style. B.G. raps on the usual topics here with his laid-back, laconic flow. At 18 tracks the album is a bit too sprawling"

It's late so excuse me for being so brief.  Rgood erm  ote    08:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)