Talk:The Hermetic Tradition

Redirect
I restored the redirect. If the editor intends to work on these articles, it may be better done in userspace, vs mainspace, as the content is not suitable for inclusion at this time and the single source is not indicative of notability just yet. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Agreed. This doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK, and the Google-books shotgun approach to sources suggests Bombardment. This source was misrepresented. While it does cover Evola, and Eberling does appear qualified, it only mentions the book itself as part of a single paragraph which. It only said that many adherents view it as important. This needs work before being restored to mainspace. Grayfell (talk) 05:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Praised by Jung
The article's sole reference does discuss Jung's approval of the book, but only as a couple of paragraphs of a much longer, relatively obscure book. It would be prudent to provide actual context here, as well as page numbers. Evola rejected Jung's ideas, as the source takes great pains to make clear, which also seems significant. Although the praise and citation by Jung does certainly help with WP:NBOOK, I do not believe it's nearly enough by itself without more substantial sources. Grayfell (talk) 23:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)