Talk:The History of Love

parts are interpretation, not summary
Some parts of this article seem to be the author's ideas about the novel, including interpretations, rather than research and factual reporting. This is particularly the case toward the end of the summary. Shouldn't the interpretations (which read like part of an essay) be removed as overly subjective? Skrolik (talk) 03:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)