Talk:The History of the Fairchild Family/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment All OK, start substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
 * 2) The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
 * 3) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
 * 4) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * 5) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * 2) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * Well written, I made a couple of minor copy edits to remove unnecessary emphasis
 * b (MoS):
 * Fine
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * Well referenced.
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * Reliable sources, assume good faith for content.
 * c (OR):
 * No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * It appears broad in scope and ....
 * b (focused):
 * ....focussed
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Follows a NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * No edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Theree pd images, correctly tagged
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Suitable captions used
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass, maintain GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass, maintain GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)