Talk:The Holocaust in Albania/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Curly Turkey (talk · contribs) 03:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * All sources seem to be reliable publications from established publishers.
 * C. No original research:
 * Everything seems to be in line with the sources.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * One image—a map—on Commons & properly tagged
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * It would be nice if there were more images, though it's a short article and the most helpful image (the map) is included
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Interesting, short article on an anomalous pocket of WWII history. I'm certainly not well-versed in this history, so am not in a position to judge its comprehensiveness, but I don't have the impression that any important issues are missing.
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * One image—a map—on Commons & properly tagged
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * It would be nice if there were more images, though it's a short article and the most helpful image (the map) is included
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Interesting, short article on an anomalous pocket of WWII history. I'm certainly not well-versed in this history, so am not in a position to judge its comprehensiveness, but I don't have the impression that any important issues are missing.