Talk:The Homosexuals (CBS Reports)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Will review shortly. Cheers, Ricardiana (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Criterion 1: well-written
This is a well-written article, and received a helpful peer review. I would like to note, however, that a sentence criticized as ungrammatical during the peer review ("The Homosexuals garnered mixed critical response, with the network garnering praise from some quarters and criticism from others for even airing the program.") was in fact perfectly grammatical. I don't know that it's worth changing back, however. In any case, looks good here.

Criterion 2: factually accurate and verifiable
Good here.

Criterion 3: broad in its coverage
It looks like you've covered all major aspects of the topics and most of the secondary sources that discuss the documentary.

Criterion 4: neutral
Good here.

Criterion 5: stable
Very stable.

Criterion 6: illustrated, if possible, by images
I think that this needs to be beefed up a bit. I'll about doing it myself. Ricardiana (talk) 22:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Changed. Ricardiana (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Verdict
It's a Good Article! Congratulations! Ricardiana (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)