Talk:The Hour of the Furnaces

Its quite impressive how anglo-centric the view on this article. There is no mention of anything about the first part of the movie, other than stating its name, while it narrates and glorifies the movie's flawed and outright incorrect representation of the Argentine reality. The parts of the documentary that were purposefully left out in the making of this article talk in fact about foreign influences and neocolonialism, which, incidentally carries with it plethora of accusations against the USA and other first world nations, making it the first target for censorship in our current day and age. The first part is in fact regarded as the most important and is the only one which is still regarded as such universally, instead of only being regarded as a propaganda film by anyone who doesn't agree with it, which is the case with the rest of the documentary. And what's the actual issue here is that nothing of what's contained in the first part of the film is mentioned on the english version of this hellish revisionist website.

In addition, if anyone is to contribute to this article in the future, please, make an attempt to not just use English journalism sources, and instead lean on reliable and less subjective sources that aren't completely foreign to the content in this movie. Any south american writing in Spanish about this movie is going to be a million times better than some opinion website's uninformed view on a matter beyond their understanding. Not to mention that any north americans would hardly ever want to admit to what is being attributed to them in the film, and, if this article is of any proof about this, its also why they are unable to be objective when it comes to discussing the contents of this movie. 181.46.160.113 (talk) 21:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)