Talk:The Incentive/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 17:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Infobox: Use start date in templates for dates
 * Done.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Infobox: No guest stars?
 * Unfortunately, no one big enough.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Infobox: Link The Office?
 * Done.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Lede: Unlink television series per WP:OVERLINK
 * Done.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Lede: Same goes for showrunner
 * Done.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Lede: NBC → the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), as per MOS:ACRO
 * Done.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Plot: Direct quotes need actual references
 * I think I fixed this.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Production: "The official website for The Office" don't think that is important to subject. Perhaps remove.
 * I kept it, as its in all the other articles. If I removed it, it would make no sense, and readers would question whether they were leaked or officially released.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Cultural references: Seems small. Expand, or merge with production
 * It's a paragraph-sized section, and production and cultural references are two different things.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Reception: "%" → "percent"
 * Done.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Reviews: Seems quotey. Consider paraphrasing, etc.
 * Done.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I did a little copy-edit, please check it, which had some typos
 * Looks good.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That's all, on hold for now. Good work.
 * TBrandley 03:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Think I got everything. Thank you!-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep. Article looks good now. Passing. Well done! TBrandley 03:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC)