Talk:The Inner Circle (The Office)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 07:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this very shortly. Thanks.  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 07:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

There are a few prose problems, but nothing too bad at all, with a little work, this should reach GA pretty easily, it's very well done.


 * "revealing his true management style with many of the female staffers believing he's sexist." Needs a little tweak for clarification, I'm not quite sure what it means, "...management style, and many of the female staffers begin to believe he is sexist?"
 * "with many commenting on Ferrell's performance" What did they comment on? Were the comments negative or positive?
 * The reviews were mixed NoD&#39;ohnuts (talk) 01:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes but the sentence said that they specifically spoke about Ferrell's performance, so what did they say about it? You can't just have an open sentence like that, it doesn't really mean anything without context.  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 09:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * "3.5 rating/10% share" I'm an idiot, can you clarify this for me? Do so again in the Ratings section please.
 * Synopsis? Aren't these things generally called Plot? A synopsis is an overview, this is a plot summary.
 * All other episodes have this NoD&#39;ohnuts (talk) 01:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough.  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 09:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * "...male, which Pam agrees too" Incorrect grammar, "which Pam agrees to" or "and Pam agrees (or somesuch)"?
 * "as Deangelo has repeatedly been acting cold towards her" coldly.
 * "Bar joke" bar is capitalized for some reason.
 * "17 percent" --> 17%
 * "beating Bones with received" which
 * "while readers gave the episode a C." Remove that sentence, it is unstable and non-notable.

 That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 08:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * A few smatterings of problems here and there that needs fixing, otherwise pretty good.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): (citations to reliable sources):  (OR):
 * Perfic'.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): (focused):
 * Perfic'
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Perfic'.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Perfic'.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * I believe I have finished all that you have asked NoD&#39;ohnuts (talk) 01:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)