Talk:The Journal of Insectivorous Plant Society

Taxon lists

 * The lists of taxa appear to contradict certain policies.
 * First, notadirectory has already been mentioned above - specifically - See no.7 Wikipedia is not a complete exposition of all possible details. Rather, an article is a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject.
 * Second, academic language should be eschewed. See: academic language # 7. Texts should be written for everyday readers, not for academics.
 * Content Information cannot be included solely for being true or useful. Merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:INDISCRIMINATE
 * Wikipedia is not a mere collection of internal links. Something like this may be appropriate for a stand alone list article. See WP:NOTLINK.
 * Wikipedia, or the article, is not a scientific journal, or academic journal and should not be treated like it is. See Wikipedia is not a scientific journal
 * These are articles about the journals. A statement that the journal is the vehicle for new species descriptions, would be sufficient. Steve Quinn (talk) 08:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)