Talk:The Kiss (Munch)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 19:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: per the article talk page, nominator is not a contributor to this article. Viriditas (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Criteria
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
 * Best practice is to cite and attribute quotes directly after the quote, not necessarily at the end of the paragraph. Viriditas (talk) 23:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Basic copyedits. Amazing images.  Good to go. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Basic copyedits. Amazing images.  Good to go. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Basic copyedits. Amazing images.  Good to go. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking this up. I'll be replying to any comments. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It's done now. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh. I'd have gotten that after work. Thanks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC)